The KIGGS study is not a vax-unvax study, as defined above. It has several problems that render it useless for measuring the health impact of the full vaccine schedule: 1) Neurological and autoimmune disorders were not measured. 2) Allergic disorders can take years to appear, and some vaccines are given after age 1, so the 1-5 age group should be excluded. The study therefore effectively had only n=50 (age 6-17) zero-vax subjects. 3) The vaccinated group is defined as receiving at least one vaccine. This dilutes the vaccinated group with lightly-vaccinated subjects. 4) The vaccinated group received an unknown number of vaccines. No details are provided about vaccine exposure (e.g. an average number of vaccines received by vaccinated subjects, or percentage that are fully vaccinated).
Давайте вы все-же найдете, какое-нибудь качественное исследование, сравнивающее именно привитых и непривитых.
no subject
http://vaccinepapers.org/alleged-vax-unvaxed-debunked/
The KIGGS study is not a vax-unvax study, as defined above. It has several problems that render it useless for measuring the health impact of the full vaccine schedule:
1) Neurological and autoimmune disorders were not measured.
2) Allergic disorders can take years to appear, and some vaccines are given after age 1, so the 1-5 age group should be excluded. The study therefore effectively had only n=50 (age 6-17) zero-vax subjects.
3) The vaccinated group is defined as receiving at least one vaccine. This dilutes the vaccinated group with lightly-vaccinated subjects.
4) The vaccinated group received an unknown number of vaccines. No details are provided about vaccine exposure (e.g. an average number of vaccines received by vaccinated subjects, or percentage that are fully vaccinated).
Давайте вы все-же найдете, какое-нибудь качественное исследование, сравнивающее именно привитых и непривитых.